The Two Escobars free essay sample

The film The Two Escobar’s, directed by Jeff and Michael Zimbalist, is a documentary about â€Å"narco-soccer†, which was a time period in Columbia when it was prevalent for drug kingpins to use soccer clubs to launder their money. One of the most infamous kingpins was Pablo Escobar. Pablo was typically known as a murderer in Columbia, but did have one passion in life, and that was soccer. The other Escobar, Andres, who had no blood relation to Pablo, was the star defensive player for Columbia’s soccer team.One thing these two had in common, besides their last name, was that the people in Columbia disliked them because of difficult circumstances they were put in. The people in Columbia viewed soccer as a way to unite their country. Although soccer wasn’t popular in the nation yet, Andres and his teammates were determined to become the best of the best. We will write a custom essay sample on The Two Escobars or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Since everyone was generally poor, the team did not have enough money to hire an international trainer, so, the chances of them becoming a renowned soccer team were extremely slim. However, when the drug kingpins used soccer clubs to launder their money, and the cocaine trade changed everything.Since Pablo was becoming increasingly rich from the drug trade in the soccer clubs, he built soccer fields around different neighborhoods, and that is how the players on the Columbia soccer team really learned how to play, and would practice on them. Even when running from authorities, Pablo would have his radio on hand to listen to the game. Everything was looking up for the two Escobar’s, and the Columbian soccer team even made it to the World Cup! Things really started taking a turn for the worst when the drug trafficking got so horrific in Columbia; the government even passed a law that abolished extradition.Pablo then surrendered, and was sent to prison. While in prison, he had soccer fields built for him, and had the Columbian soccer team often play there. Pablo thought it had so much power; he had killed a couple of people in prison, and that’s when everything went downhill for him. The Cali Cartel formed PEPE’s, People Persecuted by Pablo Escobar, and they wanted Pablo dead. PEPE’s offered Pablo an ultimatum: turn yourself by midnight on December 31st, and if not, staring January 1st, they will start killing his family member. Then, on December 2, 1993, Pablo Escobar was murdered.Even though Columbia did not know what to do after their â€Å"boss† had died, the soccer team was heading toward the World Cup. While playing an intense game against the United States, a devastating occurrence happened; Andres Escobar accidently scored on his own goal, causing Columbia to lose, and were kicked out of the World Cup. Even if Andres teammates did not blame him for that accidental goal, some people in Columbia were upset because the bet big money that the Columbian’s were going to win it all. On July 2, 1994, Andres Escobar was surrounded, shot and killed while trying to defend his actions towards that overwhelming World Cup loss.Many believe if Pablo Escobar were alive, then Andres would not have been shot and klled. Columbia had gone through a great loss and horrible tragedies. Most thought soccer would bring the nation together, but all it did was rip the nation apart. The death of the two Escobar’s marked the end of the wonder years of Columbian soccer. The Two Escobar’s was an amazing documentary about how everything and everyone’s lives essentially revolves around soccer, and how it strongly impacted when the Columbians lost the World Cup. I’ve just always looked at soccer as just a sport.However, in Columbia, it was a lifestyle. Soccer there was a way to escape your problems you were having whether it was at home or with your family. I do think Pablo and Andres both have amazing stories. Although both dead, their deaths strongly impacted Columbia and peoples lives in a huge way. Pablo was not only one of the biggest drug kingpins, but surprisingly to some people, he also had a heart and reached out to others. Not only did he build soccer fields in different neighborhoods, but he also built people homes. He was a god to some people, and I can kind of see why. He was basically a bittersweet individual. Watching the footage of his funeral was baffling. I was in awe when the people who attended his funeral opened up his casket and touch his dead body. Also, the amount of people there had to be in the thousands. It was an unbelievable sight to see, and I have literally never seen anything or anyone act like that after a death. Andres death was the most tragic. Someone being shot because of an accidental goal, that his teammates didn’t even take seriously.This just shows how much soccer is important to this country. His life really shows me how things could be perfect at one moment, but then can change at the snap of the fingers. His death was a real tragedy, and I do not think such a thing should have happened to him. My heart goes out to his poor family. They thought everything was looking up for him, and he could have potentially played for the soccer team in Milan, Italy, but all those dreams were crushed. If Andres was still alive today, I bet he would be huge in the soccer world and one of the best players out there. I wouldn’t necessarily say this documentary changed my life, but it changed my outlook on life. Columbia seemed like a united nation due to the rise of soccer, but it was the crushed. It really makes me think that those actions could happen to anyone or anywhere; it is just a matter of how things play out. You cannot also blame people for simple mistakes. It’s a fact that people do make mistakes! This film has also taught me not to turn down documentaries because they seem boring to you, and because they have subtitles, because I actually want to watch this movie again, it was that astounding to me.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Essay Example

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Essay Example Rhetorical Analysis Essay Essay Rhetorical Analysis Essay Essay Texting and driving is one of the most debated topics in society. Whether it affects all people or whether or not youre Just good at multi tasking. Yet, all people would come to the agreement that it is one the most dangerous activities to participate in and ends millions of lives yearly. Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone Risks published in New York Times by Matt Richtel and LOL? Texting While Driving Is No Laughing Matter: Proposing a Coordinated Response to Curb this Dangerous Activity by Alexis M. Farris are two articles that present variations of ethos, pathos, and logos nd make identical arguments claiming that texting and driving is not only dangerous but is shaping the way Americans live. Both articles illustrate several accounts on the dangers of texting and driving and how the activity could potentially be stopped proving both articles to be well accounted for. While Matt Richtel and Alexis. M. Farris both reach the conclusion that texting while driving has a negative impact on people, Farris article is far deeper and less biased then Richtels who relies more on personal inference rather than factual evidence. Matt Richtel begins his article Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone risks ith a personal account of a young man getting his first car and within the first couple of months of driving ending anothers life because of texting and driving. Richtel, conveys the dangers of texting and driving through interviews with teenagers and adults. Richtels use of this technique in writing makes his article personal and rather informal and directed to a more general public audience by interviewing people who are guilty of texting and driving making the situation more relatable. People such as Tad Jones who is the floor leader in the Oklahoma house who stated Im on the phone from when I leave the Capitol to when I get home, and thats a two hour drive, a lot of people who travel are used to using the phone (Richtel, 2). Ricthels main focus is the issue with people not understanding or caring about the dangers of texting and driving. Richtel makes decent claims and produces data and surveys that should open the eyes toa general audience such as 81 percent of cellphone users acknowledged that they talk on phones while driving and 98 percent considered themselves safe drivers (Richtel, 3). Richtel uses real life situations and eople to persuade the audience into realizing the severity of texting and driving and utilizes the information he has in way that interests the audience to want to know more about the topic at hand. Alexis M. Farriss article LOL? Texting While Driving is No Laughing Matter: Proposing a Coordinated Response to Curb Dangerous Activity introduces the audience with information about the increasing number of wireless cellphone users a long with increasing number of text messages that are sent every year (Farris, 237). Farris main goal in her article is to make the audience aware of the statistics and esearch that proves texting and driving to be extremely dangerous and to propose a solution that could help end distracted driving. Farris introduces the audience with statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration revealing the 20 percent of all car crash fatalities in 2009 were someway involved in distracted driving targeted toward a more academic audience such as researchers and scholars. In Farris article she addresses the Government and legislatures stating that Congress should utilize its Commerce Clause and essentially force the States to legislate the area of texting while driving (Farris, 251). She also goes on to lay out and explain the Bills and Laws that have been sent to Congress multiple times that ban using a cell phone while driving yet Farris claims that Congress has not acted (Farris, 254). Farris logic in her claims are supported well and she illustrates many compelling facts that prove the dangers of texting while driving to be accurate. Matt Richtels and Alexis Farris articles discuss the same issue and ultimately have the same end in mind on what to do about texting and driving. However, the information and credibility presented in each article is different. Matt Richtel, a journalist for New York Times presents many facts about texting while driving a long with the multiple interviews with people sharing their personal opinions, experiences and views about the issue and although the interviews and facts he presents are interesting they do not prove to be credible. Richtel fails to provide any sources for any of his research and seems biased in some of his claims in his article and completely lacking ethos. For example, Richtel presented a set of data that illustrated the number of cellphone distractions that caused deaths every year and went on to ay that Americans have largely ignored the research and that there is a large disconnect between perception and reality that is worsening the problem claiming that drivers overestimate their own ability to safely multitask (Richtel, 1). Texting and driving is a difficult topic to be unbiased about but Richtels claims make it seem that he is basing his opinions off of research and not experience. Whereas, Alexis Farris article consists of constant research and data supported by multiple transportation administrations and content pulled from bills stating rules about texting and driving (Farris, 252). Alex Farris obtained her Jurius Doctor degree from the Washington School of Law making her fully equipped to research the legal matters regarding distracted driving. Although Farris does state that Congress should step up and pass a bill ending texting and driving and propose ideas in order for it to subside, she backs up her claims with research and also attempts to see both sides of the issue with banning texting and driving. For example, Alexis stated that maybe the reason this happens is because people are so used to checking their emails and sending text messages all the time. Farris claims Drivers feel that they can support egislation banning texting while driving and yet still text themselves because, when it comes to texting while driving, they minimize the dangers of their own actions (Farris, 246). Farris attempts to see the reasoning behind why people continue to text and drive without blindly making a statement and once her evidence is Justified, she states her claim again tying herself back into her main points while using the right amount of ethos throughout the article. Matt Richtels use of pathos throughout Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone Risks is what makes the audience keep reading. By using personal interviews about individuals experiences the article seems much more applicable to the audience. Richtel interviewed a man who plead guilty to negligent homicide for the death of a woman he hit while he was distracted at the wheel of car. The man he interviewed told Richtel l hope they dont communicated to his audience through their emotions and made his article personal and relatable by using language that the audience could understand and connect with. In Alexis Farris article LOL? Texting while Driving is No Laughing Matter: Proposing a Coordinated Response to Curb Dangerous Activity provided no motional appeal whatsoever. Farris focused on the business side of texting while driving rather than diving into the audiences emotions. Since the audience is mainly targeted towards scholars and researchers the terms used are complex and a lot more technical than Richtels article. For example, Farris refers to the federal government and legislation multiple times throughout her article and discusses laws and policy of transportation in detail (Farris, 254). Although Alexis Farris pathos was not as present in her writings she targets the audience she intended to and does not et caught up in the emotions of the topic and base her article solely on emotional experience. Matt Richtels and Alexis Farris articles both illustrated key points in the controversial issue of texting while driving. While Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone Risks had a strong sense of pathos through emotional connection it lacked research and evidence to back up Richtels arguments and claims, causing the article to seem one-dimensional. LOL? Texting while Driving is No Laughing Matter: Proposing a Coordinated Response exemplified ethos and logos and while it did not resent the strongest pathos, Farris was confident in her claims and arguments about texting while driving enabling the article to stand on its own. Farris, Alexis M. I. LOL? Texting While Driving Is No Laughing Matter: Proposing A Coordinated Response To Curb This Dangerous Activity. Washington University Journal Of Law Policy 36. (2011): 233-259. Index to Legal Periodicals Books Full Text (H. W. Wilson). Web. 14 Nov. 2013. Richtel, Matt. Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone Risks. Www. nytimes. com. New York Times, 19 June 2009. Web. 4 Nov. 2013.

Project management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1

Project management - Essay Example However, besides all the tools, concepts and extensive planning’s, the strength of any project and businesses are the employees and workers operating in the project. The organizations have two fates, rather they go up and gains success or they vanish slowly and gradually. And the success and vice versa depends on the performance of the employees. So whether it is a small business or large firm, the quality of the employees makes it, or breaks it. Along with it the satisfaction of the employees, their performance and their motivation and rewards are the most important aspects for the successful upgrading. The leadership qualities of the project manager are the baseline of the successful project. Within a project, there stands from few to hundreds of personnel that have different attitudes and different frame of mind, so it’s all within the project manager that at the end of the project is either praised the most or humiliated, otherwise. The leadership qualities include excellent command over verbal and non verbal skills, ability to cope with the extreme situations and consistency. He should be flexible in terms of compensations and rewards, should asses the problems at what glance and must be capable of handling the situation as a boss. The project manager must have excellent convincing power and he must know that how to communicate all what is required from the employees as a work. The job description communicated adequately also defines the nature of working of the employees. Hiring the right employees is not only important but the most essential part of the project management, because these employees will be conducting all of the works and tasks required for the objectives of the project to be completed. The motivation of the employees is the very important factor in order to get the project successful. The competitive project manager knows that the motivation is the driving force of the employees and worker. The lack of motivation results in b ad management and hence results in the failure of the project implementation. Lack of motivation will result in low sales, improper implementation of procedures, rise in unwanted expenses, and negligence to good work, that all contribute to ineffective management. It is always obvious when the project manager see the sales getting down or rather the target could not be achieved accordingly. The most important thing before getting to the employees is finding and getting RIGHT employees for the project. For the things get moving in the right direction, the project manager needs the right employees. And it is the part where the first success of the project lies. Another important aspect is the consideration of the employee requirement. â€Å"It is a two way handshake that becomes the arms of single body†. For the competitive employee hiring, the project must be of the same caliber. The desires, thoughts and requirements of the employees are very important. Along with the employe e’s selection and recruiting, the working environment of the employees is very important. Safe and sound work environment creates ideal conditions for the employees to work properly. The employee motivation to do work according to the manager needs also lies within the other important factor which is the benefits offered. The benefits attracts the good and professional employees that latter becomes the driving force towards success. In order for the efficient workforce, the modern theory of the